The word you just clicked on in the previous page, was sown on the Internet on the 14th of December 2002. It began as a hapax, i.e. a word which appears once and only once in the literature, and by extension, which appears once and only once on the web, considered as a global text. Indeed I carefully checked out on all the search engines that there was no occurence of this word on the web beforehand. The aim of this piece is to follow, month after month, year after year, the birth and the life of this new signifier which has no signification yet as I write these lines. Christophe
Bruno |
| The most recent post
is a the bottom of the page December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 May 2003 September 2003 August 2005 September 2005 |
| December
2002 As I explained above, I carefully checked out on all the search engines that there was no occurence of the hapax on the web beforehand. Here is a list of search results for december 2002 which indicates that the word in question does not exist on the Web yet: google.com altavista.com alltheweb.com yahoo.com excite.com tiscali.com ask.com looksmart.com onelook.com overture.com Here appears a logical paradox, which is typical of our approach: in order to keep track of the pages linked above, I had to duplicate them on my server. These pages are explicitly quoting the hapax. Hence, by this very fact, the word should lost its hapax status. In order to maintain this status, I have chosen to exclude these pages from search engine inclusion (technically, this is achieved with a robots.txt file). This way, I erase the track of these pages. I could have proceeded differently, but I prefer that the first step comes from a place different from my own quotations. We see that the fact that the web can be seen as a global text is related to the presence of search engines: they unify the texts on the web so as to form a connected graph. All this requires some more precise definitions: 1) I define as "Global Text" the set of the online texts, as related one to each other by search requests. Thus, a webpage which does not appear in the search engines is not part of this set. 2) A search result (as the ones linked above) page will be considered as to be of the order of speech and not of writing. It does not belong to the Global Text. |
| January
2003 The hapax page appears in a few search engines. I have recorded the result page for google here. Note that for the time being, the word is still a hapax. As indicated last month, this page of results cannot be considered as belonging to the "Global Text". |
February
2003 Now let's wait and see what is going to happen next. |
March
2003 The first part of the word remains unclear, although it looks a bit familiar to me. |
| May
2003 There are now a few hundreds of webpages that mention my hapax. It's quite funny how it propagates. However, I can't perceive any emergence of a meaning yet. It's quite strange because when I launched the project I was quite fascinated by my idea, it was a sort of zero-ground "meme" (cf the memetics theory of R. Dawkins), the propagation of an empty virus. Now it's launched, I almost don't care about what is going to happen. Maybe nothing. It's out of my control anyway... |
| September
2003 I've made a little program to try to get some information about the growth of the hapax. I will try to put it online sometimes. |
August
2005 All these memories were quite fuzzy in my mind, but I had enough of them to be able to understand the origin of the hapax I had sown three years before: this word supposedly with no origin was in fact a kind of autoreferential pun on the name of a river with no source, called "Sorgue", first syllab of the hapax. |
| September
2005 Since I discovered the origin of my hapax in a memory of my childhood (see the previous post), I work on a new project Cosmolalia.com . It's about mythologies and the Web (not mythologies of the Web). I don't know yet where I'm going, we'll see. |